A group of taxa A taxon is a group of (one or more) organisms, which a taxonomist adjudges to be a unit. Usually a taxon is given a name and a rank, although neither is a requirement. Defining what belongs or does not belong to such a taxonomic group is done by a taxonomist. It is not uncommon for one taxonomist to disagree with another on what exactly belongs to is said to be paraphyletic if the group contains its last In genetics, the most recent common ancestor of any set of organisms is the most recent individual from which all organisms in the group are directly descended. The term is often applied to human genealogy common ancestor In evolutionary biology, a group of organisms have common descent if they have a common ancestor. All living organisms on Earth are descended from a common ancestor or ancestral gene pool but does not contain all the descendants of that ancestor. This term is used in both phylogenetics In biology, phylogenetics is the study of evolutionary relatedness among various groups of organisms , which is discovered through molecular sequencing data and morphological data matrices. The term phylogenetics is of Greek origin from the terms phyle/phylon (φυλή/φῦλον), meaning "tribe, race," and genetikos (γενετικός[note 1] and linguistics Linguistics is the scientific study of natural language. Linguistics encompasses a number of sub-fields. An important topical division is between the study of language structure and the study of meaning (semantics and pragmatics). Grammar encompasses morphology (the formation and composition of words), syntax (the rules that determine how words.

Contents

Phylogenetics

Relation to monophyletic groups

Groups that do include all the descendants of the most recent common ancestor are said to be monophyletic In common cladistic usage, monophyletic describes a group of organisms that form a clade, consisting of a last common ancestor and all of its descendants. The term is not synonymous with the less common term holophyly, which does not include a last common ancestor. It is contrasted with the terms paraphyly, which is a taxonomic group consisting of. A paraphyletic group is a monophyletic group from which one or more of the clades A clade[note 1] is a group consisting of an organism and all its descendants. In the terms of biological systematics, a clade is a single "branch" on the "tree of life". The idea that such a "natural group" of organisms should be grouped together and given a taxonomic name is central to biological classification. In is excluded to form a separate group (as in the paradigmatic example of reptiles and birds, shown in the picture).

A group that does not contain the most recent common ancestor of its members is said to be polyphyletic For example, the group consisting of warm-blooded animals is polyphyletic, because it contains both mammals and birds, but the most recent common ancestor of mammals and birds was cold-blooded. Warm-bloodedness evolved separately in the ancestors of mammals and the ancestors of birds, so it is not a true phylogenetic grouping (Greek πολύς [polys], "many").

These terms were developed during the debates of the 1960s and 70s accompanying the rise of cladistics Cladistics is a method of classifying species of organisms into groups called clades, which consist of 1) all the descendants of an ancestral organism and 2) the ancestor itself. For example, birds, dinosaurs, crocodiles, and all descendants of their most recent common ancestor form a clade. In the terms of biological systematics, a clade is a (a clade is a term for a monophyletic group).

Examples of paraphyletic groups

Many of the older classifications contain paraphyletic groups, especially the traditional 2–6 kingdom In biology, kingdom or regnum is a taxonomic rank, which is either the highest rank or in the more recent three-domain system, the rank below domain. Kingdoms are divided into smaller groups called phyla or divisions in botany. The complete sequence of ranks is life, domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species systems and the classic division of the vertebrates Vertebrates are members of the subphylum Vertebrata, chordates with backbones or spinal columns. About 58,000 species of vertebrates have been described. Vertebrata is the largest subphylum of chordates, and contains many familiar groups of large land animals. Vertebrates comprise cyclostomes, bony fish, sharks and rays, amphibians, reptiles,. Paraphyletic groups are often erected on the basis of (sym)plesiomorphies (ancestral similarities) instead of (syn)apomorphies In cladistics, a synapomorphy or synapomorphic character is a trait that is shared by two or more taxa and their most recent common ancestor, whose ancestor in turn does not possess the trait. A synapomorphy is thus an apomorphy visible in multiple taxa, where the trait in question originates in their last common ancestor. The word " (derived similarities). Examples of well-known paraphyletic groups includes:

Cladistics generally discourages paraphyletic groups

In most cladistics Cladistics is a method of classifying species of organisms into groups called clades, which consist of 1) all the descendants of an ancestral organism and 2) the ancestor itself. For example, birds, dinosaurs, crocodiles, and all descendants of their most recent common ancestor form a clade. In the terms of biological systematics, a clade is a-based schools of taxonomy Taxonomy is the practice and science of classification. The word finds its roots in the Greek τάξις, taxis and νόμος, nomos (meaning 'law' or 'science'). Taxonomy uses taxonomic units, known as taxa (singular taxon), the existence of paraphyletic groups (as well as polyphyletic For example, the group consisting of warm-blooded animals is polyphyletic, because it contains both mammals and birds, but the most recent common ancestor of mammals and birds was cold-blooded. Warm-bloodedness evolved separately in the ancestors of mammals and the ancestors of birds, so it is not a true phylogenetic grouping groups) in a classification is discouraged. Monophyletic In common cladistic usage, monophyletic describes a group of organisms that form a clade, consisting of a last common ancestor and all of its descendants. The term is not synonymous with the less common term holophyly, which does not include a last common ancestor. It is contrasted with the terms paraphyly, which is a taxonomic group consisting of groups (that is, clades A clade[note 1] is a group consisting of an organism and all its descendants. In the terms of biological systematics, a clade is a single "branch" on the "tree of life". The idea that such a "natural group" of organisms should be grouped together and given a taxonomic name is central to biological classification. In) are considered by these schools of thought to be the most important grouping of organisms, for the following reasons:

Uses for paraphyletic groups

Others argue that paraphyletic groups are necessary for a comprehensive classification including extinct groups, since each species, genus, and so forth necessarily originates from part of another.

For instance, the Prokaryote group is paraphyletic because it excludes many of its descendent organisms (the Eukaryotes), yet the Prokaryote group is very useful because it has a clearly-defined and significant distinction (no cell nucleus) from its excluded descendants. So, even though Prokaryotes are not a clade, the term is still useful.

It has been suggested that paraphyletic groups be clearly marked to distinguish them from clades, for instance with asterisks: Reptilia*. The term evolutionary grade is sometimes used for such groups.[9]

Linguistics

Main article: Tree model

The concept of paraphyly has also been applied to historical linguistics, where the methods of cladistics have found some utility in comparing languages. For instance, the Formosan languages form a paraphyletic group of the Austronesian languages as the term refers to the nine branches of the Austronesian family that are not Malayo-Polynesian and restricted to the island of Taiwan.[10]

Notes

  1. ^ A paraphyletic group is defined in terms of a clade; that is, the group is the same as the equivalent clade, except that it lacks one or more of the clade's full complement. The concept of the last common ancestor is the same, but it has been expanded to be node-based, branch-based and apomorphy-based. Those terms are defined under Phylogenetic nomenclature.
  2. ^ The history of flowering plant classification can be found under History of the classification of flowering plants.

References

  1. ^ a b Laurin, Michel; Gauthier, Jacques A. (1996). "Amniota". Tree of Life Web Project. http://tolweb.org/amniota. Retrieved 25 January 2010.
  2. ^ Simpson 2006, pp. 139–140. "It is now thought that the possession of two cotyledons is an ancestral feature for the taxa of the flowering plants and not an apomorphy for any group within. The 'dicots' ... are paraphyletic ...."
  3. ^ O'Leary, Maureen A. (2001). "The Phylogenetic Position of Cetaceans: Further Combined Data Analyses, Comparisons with the Stratigraphic Record and a Discussion of Character Optimization". American Zoologist 41 (3): 487–506. doi:10.1093/icb/41.3.487. http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/41/3/487.
  4. ^ Sapp, Jan (June 2005). "The Prokaryote-Eukaryote Dichotomy: Meanings and Mythology". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 69 (2): 292–305. doi:10.1128/MMBR.69.2.292-305.2005. PMID 15944457. PMC 1197417. http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/2/292?ijkey=9c01f67410bfc780c9d62495284c6efd50dc4f46#THE_TALE_OF_EDOUARD_CHATTON.
  5. ^ Stackebrabdt, E.; Tindell, B.; Ludwig, W.; Goodfellow, M. (1999). "Prokaryotic Diversity and Systematics". in Lengeler, Joseph W.; Drews, Gerhart; Schlegel, Hans Günter. Biology of the prokaryotes. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag. p. 679
  6. ^ Berg, Linda (2008). Introductory Botany: Plants, People, and the Environment (2nd ed.). Belmont CA: Thomson Corporation. p. 360. ISBN 0030754534.
  7. ^ Janvier, Philippe (2002) [1996]. Early Vertebrates. Oxford Monographs in Geology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 44. ISBN 0198540477.
  8. ^ A Tree of Life
  9. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2004). "Mammal-like Reptiles". The Ancestor's Tale, A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 0-618-00583-8.
  10. ^ Greenhill, Simon J. and Russell D. Gray. (2009.) "Austronesian Language and Phylogenies: Myths and Misconceptions About Bayesian Computational Methods," in Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: a Festschrift for Robert Blust, edited by Alexander Adelaar and Andrew Pawley. Canberra : Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.

Bibliography

External links

Topics in phylogenetics
Relevant fields Computational phylogenetics · Molecular phylogeny · Cladistics
Basic concepts Phylogenetic tree · Phylogenetic network · Long branch attraction · Clade · Ghost lineage
Inference methods Maximum parsimony · Maximum likelihood · Neighbor-joining · UPGMA · Bayesian inference · Least squares
Current topics PhyloCode · DNA barcoding
-morphy Symplesiomorphy · Apomorphy · Plesiomorphy · Synapomorphy · Autapomorphy
-phyly Monophyly/Holophyly · Paraphyly · Polyphyly
List of evolutionary biology topics

Categories: Phylogenetics

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers]
This page was last archived by our server on Thu Jul 29 06:45:24 2010. [ refresh local cache ]
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.


polyphyly jpeg
biology.unm.edu
polyphyly jpeg
477px x 365px | 45.50kB

[source page]

ancestor of birds Without birds included reptiles is a paraphyletic group Groups are polyphyletic when they include multiple taxa but not the common ancestors Determining Phylogenetic Relationships Phylogenetic relationships are established by analyzing homologous traits Homologous traits are traits which are similar in two taxa

Yahoo Images Search: Paraphyletic,
Sun Jun 20 00:54:25 2010
on john wilkins' blog: clade
menvall.wordpress.com
on john wilkins' blog: clade

menvall

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:51:34 GM

obviously missing that also . paraphyletic. groups can be separated from the rest by a single cut (eg the clade representing humans and the clade representing chimps, excluding their ancestor). such . paraphyletic. groups are thus also ...

Google Blogs Search: Paraphyletic,
Sun Jul 18 01:05:14 2010